追光者 Pulse HK News
  • 編輯推介
  • 蘋果案
  • 支聯會案
  • 宏福苑大火
  • 港聞
  • 兩岸
  • 國際
  • 北美
  • 英國
  • 追光解碼
  • 圖解DATA
  • 專題
  • 離散・港情
  • 專訪
  • 追光會客室
  • 評論
  • 財經節目
  • 專欄
  • Podcast
  • 社群園地
  • 關於我們
  • 編輯推介
  • 蘋果案
  • 支聯會案
  • 宏福苑大火
  • 港聞
  • 兩岸
  • 國際
  • 北美
  • 英國
  • 追光解碼
  • 圖解DATA
  • 專題
  • 離散・港情
  • 專訪
  • 追光會客室
  • 評論
  • 財經節目
  • 專欄
  • Podcast
  • 社群園地
  • 關於我們
追光者 Pulse HK News
文字大小Aa
  • 蘋果案
  • 支聯會案
  • 宏福苑大火
  • 港聞
  • 兩岸
  • 國際
  • 北美
  • 英國
  • 追光解碼
  • 圖解DATA
  • 專題
  • 離散・港情
  • 專訪
  • 追光會客室
  • 評論
  • 社群園地
  • 專欄
  • 財經節目
  • Podcast
  • 關於我們
文字大小Aa
追光者 Pulse HK News追光者 Pulse HK News
  • 編輯推介
  • 蘋果案
  • 支聯會案
  • 宏福苑大火
  • 港聞
  • 兩岸
  • 國際
  • 北美
  • 英國
  • 追光解碼
  • 圖解DATA
  • 專題
  • 離散・港情
  • 專訪
  • 追光會客室
  • 評論
  • 財經節目
  • 專欄
  • Podcast
  • 社群園地
  • 關於我們
搜尋更多內容
  • 編輯推介
  • 蘋果案
  • 支聯會案
  • 宏福苑大火
  • 港聞
  • 兩岸
  • 國際
  • 北美
  • 英國
  • 追光解碼
  • 圖解DATA
  • 專題
  • 離散・港情
  • 專訪
  • 追光會客室
  • 評論
  • 財經節目
  • 專欄
  • Podcast
  • 社群園地
  • 關於我們
登入以瀏覽訂閱內容 登入
追蹤我們
《追光者 Pulse HK》擁有全部文章、相片及影片版權,未經許可不得轉載。
專欄

Onward and Upward|Creative Writing Exam Tip: Write What You Know

Michelle Ng
2026 年 1 月 7 日
分享
37 分鐘閱讀時間
分享

In my line of work as a private tutor, it is not unusual for parents to approach me with this problem at hand: their children (usually boys) are predicted to achieve the highest GCSE grades in subjects like maths, physics and chemistry, only for their attainment reports to be marred by a failing or barely passing grade in English.

The creative writing section of the GCSE English paper is often viewed as the most menacing, and some students cope by memorizing a pre-written story beforehand and then regurgitating it more or less directly onto their exam papers. This tactic may relieve them of the pain of writing from scratch in an exam setting, but that’s about it. It almost certainly can’t improve their grades, as examiners can usually immediately tell a shortcut was taken. Year after year, GCSE Examiners’ Reports have cautioned against taking this easy way out:

“Some students had leaned heavily upon ‘learned’ responses, the details of which are quickly recognisable and do not often add to their piece.” (AQA Examiner’s Report November 2021)

“There were some responses that had clearly been memorised and adapted for the topic of the question, so were not entirely relevant.” (Edexcel Examiner’s Report June 2022)

“There was some evidence of ‘prepared’ stories being used as batches of candidates produced identical responses. This is not in the spirit of the examination and can be counter-productive in preventing candidates from showing what they can really do.” (Eduqas Examiners’ Report Summer 2024)

The message is clear: writing on cue matters in exams. One solution to dealing with creative writing exams is to borrow from a trick well-known among professional writers: Write what you know. Instead of adapting the given topic to a pre-memorized story, connect it to a field you’re familiar with. This way, instead of having to invent details on the spot, you can simply draw on your existing knowledge. Your mental bandwidth can then be totally devoted to writing the story.

This past week I worked on this GCSE creative writing topic with a student:

Write the opening of a story that begins with the line:

“No one else seemed to notice, but something was definitely wrong.”

You may wish to include:

a sense of mystery or tension

the setting

the character’s reaction

As I mulled over how to respond, it suddenly struck me that I could take advantage of my extensive knowledge of dermal fillers – over the years I’ve done enough research to know I should stay away from them – to whip up a story that checked all the boxes. Below is my piece:

No one else seemed to notice, but something was definitely wrong.

As soon as the dermatologist gave Mary the facial injection that was supposed to solve all the longstanding problems caused by years of fillers, she felt a burning sensation ricocheting its way beneath her cheeks.

Suspecting her face must be beet red from the pain, she asked for a handheld mirror.

She looked normal.

“Don’t worry. Some swelling is common. Kylie Jenner had the same dissolver. Her face is normal now, and so will yours. In two weeks you’ll see your results,” Dr Smith assured her cheerily.

Mary caught sight of the words “Dr Stephen Smith, MD, FAAD, FACS” etched above the breast pocket of his white coat, and she tried to calm her fears. The double board-certified dermatologist she had chosen had hundreds of five-star reviews on Google. He charged almost double the market price. His waiting room was full of patients. Surely he must be good?

The agent he shot into her face had a fancy-sounding name – Hyaluronidase. It seemed just as fancy as the names of the fillers she had relied on over the past decade to smooth out her lines – Juvederm, Restylane, Radiesse. These gel-like substances, which were supposed to break down on their own within six months, had now hardened and lodged stubbornly beneath her facial muscles, giving her the same pillow face that had ruined the natural good looks of A-listers like Madonna and Nicole Kidman. Hyaluronidase, the drug that was supposed to melt away fillers, was touted by Dr Smith and his kind as the miracle solution.

By evening, the burning had intensified into a sear. Her face felt like a five-hundred-degree sizzle platter, the kind Ruth’s Chris famously used to serve their prime rib. She imagined if she were to put a pat of butter on her cheeks, it would hiss just as noisily. Unable to sleep, she went online and googled “Hyaluronidase” and “burning feeling.”

The mere sight of the search results on the first page shook Mary so intensely that she almost fell off her chair.

***

Michelle Ng

英國牛津大學畢業,前《蘋果日報》和《眾新聞》專欄作家,現在身在楓葉國,心繫中國大陸和香港。

聯絡方式: michelleng.coach@proton.me
個人網站: https://michellengwritings.com

標籤:Michelle NgOnward and Upward
分享此文章
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Threads Email Copy Link Print
上一篇 台空軍F16機師花蓮跳傘後失蹤 賴清德指示全力搜救
下一篇 今天是禮物|修訂《逃犯引渡條例》的涵義——【第六十四章:細看關稅五回合後的第一階段協議:誰在贏?誰在讓?(2/3)】

編輯推介

橫流集|沉默、共謀與責任分級——從當代共謀論到香港情況的倫理反思
2026 年 2 月 24 日
中文教育眼|馬年說馬字
2026 年 2 月 22 日
京城外望|從郭鳳儀父親被定罪看國安法的濫用
2026 年 2 月 21 日
橫流集|沉默即服從,服從即共謀——從拉波埃西《自願為奴論》解讀中大開除關靖豐事件中的集體噤聲
2026 年 2 月 20 日
《追光者》告讀者書
2026 年 2 月 19 日

最多瀏覽

中國人不再需要翻牆?美國推平台繞過中國伊朗網絡審查 使用者匿名
2026 年 2 月 23 日
毒梟報復失控|墨西哥機場大亂 旅客拖喼逃命 安檢變趴地避難
2026 年 2 月 23 日
黎智英案判刑|黎采向谷愛凌發公開信 籲向中方官員提黎案
2026 年 2 月 23 日
中國YouTuber踢爆小米Oppo等手提電話品牌集體造假 影片被下架後發聲再被封
2026 年 2 月 24 日
劍橋提名中大校長盧煜明獲頒榮譽學位 在英港人聯署促校方重新考慮
2026 年 2 月 24 日

支持 《追光者》

按此訂閱

其他新聞

Podcast宏福苑大火

鍾劍華時評|宏福苑原址重建真要10年? 港府方案選擇少兼不化算

2026 年 2 月 24 日
專欄

Onward and Upward|The Moment My Student Said “One day I want to be like them too”

2026 年 2 月 22 日
專欄

紫微識少少|丙干紫破在丑

2026 年 2 月 22 日
上一頁 下一頁
追光者 Pulse HK News

《追光者 Pulse HK》是一個全新的香港人國際新聞平台,為世界各地的香港人提供24小時新聞。

緊貼《追光者 Pulse HK》

《追光者 Pulse HK》擁有全部文章、相片及影片版權,未經許可不得轉載。